Castellan · Vision
Castellan · Vision

The physical layer of sovereign AI.

AI compute is becoming the most consequential infrastructure of the century — and today it is concentrated in the hands of a few U.S. hyperscalers. Castellan exists to correct that imbalance. We are a Swiss company that develops, builds and leases data centres for AI in Europe and North America — as a powered shell or fully fitted, so our customers only bring their GPUs.

~75%
Share of global GPU-cluster performance located in the United States (Epoch AI, 2025)
€200B
EU InvestAI initiative to mobilise investment in AI (European Commission, 2025)
>2×
Global data-centre electricity demand by 2030, ~945 TWh (IEA, 2025)
800MW
Minimum pipeline by 2032 · four build phases
01
The problem

Concentration is a strategic exposure.

The United States hosts about three-quarters of the world's GPU-cluster performance (Epoch AI, 2025), and three U.S. providers — Amazon, Microsoft and Google — hold 63% of cloud infrastructure services spending (Synergy Research Group, Q3 2025). For most workloads, most of the time, that is merely convenient. For governments, defence and research institutions, banks, insurers, and healthcare systems — organisations whose mandates do not permit their data, model weights, or inference traffic to fall under foreign jurisdiction — it is a structural dependency with no easy exit.

The exposure is legal before it is technical. Under instruments such as the U.S. CLOUD Act, providers subject to American jurisdiction can be compelled to disclose data regardless of where the server physically stands. A data centre in Frankfurt operated by a U.S. entity is, in every way that matters to a European ministry or regulator, not European infrastructure. We set out the full argument in our analysis of why sovereign compute is Europe's defining infrastructure question.

European regulation is moving in the opposite direction of the market's concentration. The EU AI Act, GDPR, DORA, and a growing body of sector-specific rules increasingly demand demonstrable control over where models are trained, where data resides, and who can be compelled to hand it over. Workloads cannot always travel. Data sovereignty is not a slogan — it is becoming a procurement requirement.

And the constraint that decides who can respond is not silicon — it is power. Global data-centre electricity demand is set to more than double by 2030, to around 945 TWh (IEA, 2025), and the EU's InvestAI initiative aims to mobilise €200 billion for investment in AI (European Commission, 2025). Whoever controls powered land, grid interconnection, and energy supply controls the pace of the build-out. That is where Castellan starts.

02
Sovereign-aligned

Sovereignty is a stack, not a sticker.

"Sovereign" has become a label attached to almost anything with a European flag on the website. Castellan treats it as an engineering and legal specification: four layers, each independently verifiable — and each of which must hold for the whole to mean anything.

  • 01
    Jurisdiction
    The facilities are owned and leased by a Swiss stock corporation in a neutral, politically stable jurisdiction, with local project entities where a site requires them — so each campus answers to the law its tenants require, by design rather than by assurance.
  • 02
    Operator
    The company that owns and manages the facility is controlled from Switzerland — not by a foreign parent that can be compelled elsewhere. We develop and manage our campuses ourselves, backed by the operating experience described in our heritage.
  • 03
    Contracts
    Long-term triple-net leases and service agreements under Swiss or EU governing law, with institutional-grade documentation — terms your general counsel can defend, not marketing language a regulator will take apart.
  • 04
    Compliance
    Documentation that supports your own outsourcing, data-residency and EU AI Act obligations — so sovereignty is something you can evidence to your regulator, not merely claim.

The same logic extends to the compute layer. Customers who need GPU capacity rather than a building can contract AI Compute with Castellan: capacity from vetted third-party hardware owners, selected to match their jurisdictional requirements. We are your contracting party; we do not own or operate GPU fleets ourselves.

03
The platform

Four phases to 800 MW by 2032.

Our build-out follows a deliberately simple sequence: secure power, sign the lease, build, commission, repeat — each phase building on the experience of the last. The pipeline reaches a minimum of 800 MW of AI capacity by 2032, with access to more than 5 GW of power through our network to scale further as demand requires.

Phase I · 2027–2028
Pilot — +50 MW
A greenfield campus of at least 50 MW in Europe or North America. Construction from 2027, commissioning in 2028 — our first campus, available as powered shell or turnkey data centre.
Phase II · 2029–2030
Expansion — +150 MW
A second campus in Europe or North America. Cumulative 200 MW in operation, with the pilot's operating record behind larger deployments and longer leases.
Phase III · 2030–2031
Multi-site — +200 MW
Cumulative 400 MW across several sites and jurisdictions — repeatable delivery and an established supply chain.
Phase IV · 2031–2032
Mature build — +400 MW
At least 800 MW, scalable as demand requires — AI infrastructure at the scale hyperscalers, AI labs and national AI programmes actually need.

We lease every campus in one of two equal models, both described under Powered Shell & Turnkey: a powered shell — land, power, building shell and core infrastructure — for customers who fit out to their own specification, or a turnkey data centre, fully fitted and ready for IT load, so customers only bring their GPUs. Both come on 15–20 year triple-net leases: cost transparency, control over your facility, and capacity on a schedule you can plan around. We normally build on our own balance sheet; organisations that want to own their facility can engage the same team through Design & Build.

Build on sovereign ground.

If your organisation needs AI capacity that stands up to scrutiny — from your board, your regulator or your government — the conversation starts here.